You are here: Home & Blog

How to Create a Winning Business Model

by lmorris on February 5, 2010

As a critical source of competitive advantage, innovation certainly deserves the attention it receives.  But innovation is also notoriously difficult to manage.  And while recognized innovators are widely admired for their achievements, every business leader knows that the pursuit of innovation is exceptionally challenging even as it is entirely necessary.

The roots of the problem lie in the fact that innovation takes place at the crossroads of two critical uncertainties:  uncertainty about the future, and uncertainty about what will be best for our organization.

Given these issues, executives face two key questions:

  • First, What innovations should our organization be pursuing?
  • And second, How should we create them?

We respond by noting that among the four types of innovation that any firm could pursue (more detail on this below), business model innovation should be highly attractive and pursued aggressively.  Why?  Because business model innovators are earning very attractive returns on capital, and finding new market opportunities that others have overlooked.

But business model innovation is also widely misunderstood, and consequently few organizations are reaping the significant benefits that can come from doing it well.

We’ve been thinking about this for some time, and working to understand why business model innovation may be important for every company.  We’re also working on a systematic program to organizations develop breakthrough business models of their own.

Four Types of Innovation

Organizations typically must allocate their innovation investments among four types of innovation:  incremental, breakthrough, new venture, and business model. (This is spelled out in considerable detail in Permanent Innovation.)

•  The purpose of incremental innovation is to maintain market share.  But it’s a maintenance strategy, and rarely confers much of an advantage.  It’s necessary, to be sure, but by no means is it sufficient to support growth.
•  The search for breakthroughs offers a shot at stardom, but as they are quite rare, pursuing breakthroughs is a properly recognized to be a high risk approach.
•  Successful new ventures can position a company for the very long term, but they are also high risk, capital intensive, and for good reasons they are rarely attempted.
•  In today’s business environment, this leaves the fourth option as the most attractive:  business model innovation can be not only the most cost-effective form of innovation, but for most firms it’s also the most promising route to success.

Recent research by IBM has shown that business model innovators are earning the most attractive returns on innovation investment, and also achieving the best rates of growth.

In fact, if you look at the most successful and admired companies of the last twenty years, you see that most of them have focused on developing innovative business models.  What company would not want to be included on this list of business model innovators:  Amazon.com, Apple, Costco, Fedex, Google, Ikea, Southwest Airlines, Starbucks, Wal-Mart, and Zara are 10 of the world’s most successful companies, and business model innovation has been the key to the success of each one.

Defining Business Model Innovation

But what exactly is a business model?

At its simplest, a business model simply describes how a company makes money.  It’s the products and services it offers, the way it delivers them, and through these elements it is the experiences that it creates for customers.

Business model innovators just find ways to create better experiences for their customers, and as a result of doing so the most successful among them earn profits that others did not recognize as even possible.

For example:

  • Google discovered how to sell words at auction, a new business model that transformed the company into the world’s number one advertising agency, and soon thereafter into one of its most admired companies.
  • Amazon.com developed a new business model for selling products online, has radically reshaped the book business, and is now working to extend its model into every market.
  • Apple found a tremendously successful way to sell songs through iTunes, permanently reshaping the music industry.
  • Fedex set up a system that delivers packages for ten to fifty times more than the Postal Service charges.
  • Southwest Airlines sells airplane tickets for less than its competitors, but it has nevertheless been the most consistently profitable US airline for two decades.
  • Wal-Mart, Costco, and Ikea, meanwhile, developed global manufacturing and supply chains that enable them to sell enormous quantities of products at prices once thought unattainably low, undercutting their competitors and redefining the very nature of retail.

To reiterate the point made above, the core of each success is that these companies found new ways to earn profits by providing their customers with new and better experiences.

Further, the experiences provided by their innovative business models have resulted in enduring relationships that transcended traditional boundaries between customers and companies, and as a result each transformed the industry in which it competes, permanently altering the competitive landscape while becoming a renowned leader.

If business model innovation is the goal, and for most companies the evidence strongly suggests that it should be, then we need a way to get there.

InnovationLabs is developing a set of analytical tools, exercises, and worksheets to help our clients develop a true master plan for business model innovation.  (Our complete set of innovation worksheets now numbers approximately 100 exercises.)

This process of 8 steps enables executives to understand the key drivers of business model innovation, and to apply them to develop business model innovations of their own.

  1. The Business Model Universe
  2. The External Drivers of Change
  3. The Customer Experience Model
  4. Core and Edge Markets Analysis
  5. Market Leader Analysis
  6. Competitor Analysis:  Jobs to Do
  7. Who Innovates?
  8. Putting it All Together: The Complete Business Model Innovation Master Plan

•••

In future posts I will be expanding upon the process and these 8 steps. If you have any thoughts or comments on the importance of business model innovation in your industry, or on the process steps mentioned here, I would love to hear from you.

This is also the topic of my current book project, The Innovation Master Plan:  How to Create a Winning Business Model. Please click on this link to go to the page where I am posting portions of the work-in-progress and inviting reader feedback.  Thank you!

•••

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

{ 0 comments }

The Future of Business Education

by mkaufman on January 25, 2010

There has been a lot written about the rate of change and how the speed of change isn’t going to slow down any time soon. One of the impacts of this condition is the complexity of doing business in any industry or sector of society has increased. This complexity challenges every leader to develop new skills and capabilities for themselves and for their organizations.

A rapidly changing environment also adds an additional layer of costs on to every business – a cost not just of dollars but of time and potential. Each year businesses spend a significant percentage of their revenues providing training to new hires and retraining to existing employees. If business schools and MBA programs could provide a more relevant education it could save business billions of dollars each year in remedial and basic training costs and increase the capacity of business to deliver more value to their customers.

Five of the major causes of our rapidly changing environment are:

  • Digitization
  • Commoditization
  • Prosumer-ization (people being both consumers and producers)
  • Globalization
  • Socialization

Each of these factors has also put significant amounts of pressure on educational institutions – and like their industrial counterparts they are scrambling to respond fast enough.

Blair Sheppard Interview

Last week McKinsey released an interview with Blair Sheppard, dean of Fuqua School of Business at Duke University. He says that traditional MBA education needs to change significantly in order to be relevant in this new era. Some of the highlights of this interview are:

  • the number of social-entrepreneurs is going up dramatically
  • the reason people want an MBA is changing (people are fed up with institutions and want to ‘fix them’)
  • people want to create both wealth and legacy
  • people need both conceptual and practical experiences

In that context he says business schools cannot meet the new expectations as presently structured. To meet these needs business schools

  • need a larger context than just business
  • need to provide a wider range of tools than just management tools (develop a broader tool kit)
  • should be more than inter-disciplinary and be inter-scholastic
  • should be connected to other schools (people should be getting joint degrees – like a law and business degree)
  • should provide leadership skills, business skills, and other skills

Reducing the Time to Learn

One of the most insightful comments he made is something I’ve long thought necessary for primary and secondary schooling as well. He said, “the students should run the school.” He says,

If they aren’t given the opportunity to make mistakes while you’re actually working with them and to take leadership positions that are consequential but not life threatening, there’s no practice for them.

It makes practical sense that older, more experienced students can have a stake in the learning and development of younger students. Sheppard acknowledges it’s a bit strange to have students paying a large sum of money and then having them run things – but something like that has to be done.

One of the best ways to shrink the development cycle time of a learner is to shrink the distance between the concept and the practice. If all learning could be real time, in context, that would be the most ideal. We won’t get there any time soon however a recent issue of Chief Learning Officer Magazine has acknowledged they are seeing practical shifts taking place in learning and elearning methodologies in organizations now. These include:

  • push back and a seeking of alternatives to compliance learning
  • designable social networks (to add learning components)
  • collaborative learning methods
  • video and video annotated learning (youtube is already the second largest search engine in the world!)
  • live video conferencing and webinars
  • project based learning
  • cloud based learning

These practices will be more prevalent in 2010 and beyond in the corporate training repertoire and should also find their way into business schools and other institutions of learning.

I think it’s a significant change for both training and development organizations as well as business schools to make learning relevant and in the right context – and not to separate the concept from the practice (or at least shrink that gap). Can they do it? and can they do it fast enough?

Strategic Planning vs Accelerated Decision Making

Another factor that should have significant implications on business schools and enterprise training & development is the need to improve the capacity of the organization to be flexible and accelerate decision making.

This recent article from the Wall Street Journal elucidates the need for businesses to continue to find more capacity for increased flexibility and accelerating decision making. That makes perfect sense as natural responses to a rapidly changing environment.

From the article, Walt Shill, head of the North American management consulting practice for Accenture Ltd., is even more extreme. He says,

“Strategy, as we knew it, is dead,” he contends. “Corporate clients decided that increased flexibility and accelerated decision making are much more important than simply predicting the future.”

In our experience the organizations we work with are finding significant value in combining their capability building and strategic thinking initiatives; so it’s more of an AND approach rather than on OR approach.

Strategy AND Flexibility AND Accelerated Decision Making

Which brings us back to business schools. I think they have their work cut out for them. Every institution of any size is experiencing the challenge of outdated structures and processes while at the same time being forced to change by the marketplace and the business and social climate.

Educational institutions are old, slow moving bureaucracies riddled with some of the same structural dynamics as large businesses.

Can they do it? Can they make the changes necessary to be viable in this new era? Time will tell.

What do you think?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

{ 0 comments }

Help Wanted: Innovation (or maybe not…)

January 15, 2010

We hear from executives everywhere about how they are genuinely concerned about the state of innovation in their organizations, and how much they want  innovation to improve.
Often enough, when they need to hire new people, they’re hoping that the new staff will be able to help them with innovation too.  I recently noticed an ad [...]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
Read the full article →

The Unknown, the Future, and the Impossible

January 11, 2010

“We sell our souls at the altar of the incremental.”
Well, we do if we embrace the view that that change is slow and steady, and comes out of what came before.
But what if it doesn’t?  What if change is radical, disruptive, breakthrough?
Innovation is always a matter of the dialog between these two poles, between the [...]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
Read the full article →

Don’t Let the Collaborative Event Tail Wag the Project Dog

December 31, 2009

I’ve been facilitating and supporting face to face collaborative events for over 25 years and sometimes have to watch against an event-centric approach in my work. Of course a major collaborative event involving perhaps hundreds of participants and spanning several days must be well designed. The event must have objectives and deliverables. It must have [...]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace
  • FriendFeed
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
Read the full article →