A Case for Reinventing Public Schools
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Where Did High School Come From

This blog is about building a case for redesigning our public schools. In several posts I have commented about the fact our schools are based on a model that was conceived and implemented some time around the 1870′s. And it hasn’t changed much. 

One thing I didn’t know is where the design for high school came from. In reading the first chapter of a book called, Personalizing the High School Experience for Each Student, I have learned that it comes from a model to reach about 5% of the young people in this country – and it was developed in the 1890′s. 
In a previous post I included a table that shows the graduation rates in US High Schools. Now that I understand that High School was really designed to graduate about 5% of the population I think we can reasonably say it’s a miracle that more than 50% actually graduate. 
In our work we make a distinction between incremental innovation and breakthrough innovation. In a previous post I’ve asked the question whether schools as we know them need to be improved or redesigned. 
I hope we can see that it’s time to provide support for the re-invention of public schools and to move beyond incremental improvements and get to breakthroughs. We are, or were, the innovation leader in the world. With a public school system that we have now that leadership is surely in jeopardy. 
Here’s a quote from the first chapter of that book:
In the 1890s, Harvard College, a regional institute of higher education, desired to become a national university. To guide Harvard leaders in how to do this and to ensure that they would be getting students from across the country who were properly prepared to be successful in higher education, the college convened the Carnegie Commission. Yes, we’re talking about that Carnegie Commission—the commission that decided that our high school students needed to earn course credits based on seat time. This 19th century concept, which is based solely on educating students who would be able to go on to Harvard, is still the basic organizing structure of our high schools in the 21st century.

The United States in the 1890s was a country whose population felt that an education past the 4th grade was a waste of time for most individuals. It was a country where high school was only for those who needed the connection between elementary school and higher education. It was a country where very few women and at most 5 percent of the young men went to college. That’s who our high schools were designed to educate: 5 percent of our young men. The rest of our adolescents were employed in our mills, mines, and farms.

"Smart Drugs" for Young People

2 comments

1 Anonymous { 07.22.09 at 7:17 pm }

What is your take on vocational education and its role as part of the high school curriculum?

2 Michael Kaufman { 07.22.09 at 8:40 pm }

That's a good question – especially since I have several clients in the business of designing and providing technical and career oriented programs.

My personal opinion is that the high school experience should be mostly project and mentor based – out in the community – in businesses and non-profits and government agencies; AND in projects improving the quality of life throughout the community.

I would redesign the high school 'curriculum' to be primarily about experiences that help teenagers learn about the world they live in and prepare them for being successful in their personal relationships, in their vocations, and in their creative pursuits.

Leave a Comment